RE: [PATCH v8 0/11] dmtimer adaptation to platform_driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin,
[...]
> >
> > Also, testing with PM on 34xx/n900, I noticed that this series prevents
> > PER and CORE from hitting retention during suspend.  I haven't debugged
> > why yet.
> I have not done power testing. I will try this out right away and confirm.
>
Here is a brief update on pm test.

(1) Without dmtimer patch series:
[  305.641204] Powerdomain (core_pwrdm) didn't enter target state 1
[  305.647491] Could not enter target state in pm_suspend

(2) With dmtimer patch series:
[   25.291503] Powerdomain (core_pwrdm) didn't enter target state 1
[   25.297790] Powerdomain (per_pwrdm) didn't enter target state 1
[   25.303985] Could not enter target state in pm_suspend

I will debug further.

--
Tarun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux