Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/13/2010 09:49 PM, the following:
ok will do. for reference, I wrote a script to make things easy for all - attached.Hi Nishanth, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes:as discussed in [1], here is step 2 - idle path errata fixes. this is the next rev incorporating comments from V2 post of this series.I had a couple small comments on individual patches. In addition, in the next series, can you report the platforms it was tested on, and how it was tested (retention idle/suspend, off idle/suspend, CPUidle enabled?, etc.) I tested this series (and Jean's cleanup patch) on 34xx/n900 with retention idle & suspend and off idle & suspend with and without CPUidle enabled.) Also, when posting an updated series, can you update the version of all patches in the series, even if they are unchanged? This makes more more explicit versioning, keeps things clearer in patchwork and avoids problems with dumb mailers who thread by subject only.Also, please Cc linux-arm-kernel when posting the next version.
With the pm-fixes being merged to master, I tested today with latest kernel.org master commit: 0fcdcfb against omap2plus_defconfig without any of my patches applied:
Results: SDP3630: Log: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/889642 Summary:SUSPEND:OFF test | PASS | OFF: 0->1| RET:0 ->0 (8 sec) SUSPEND:RET test | PASS | OFF: 1->1| RET:0 ->1 (8 sec) IDLE:OFF test | PASS | OFF: 1->24| RET:1 ->1 (21 sec)
IDLE:RET test | PASS | OFF: 24->| RET:1 ->23 (21 sec) SDP3430 (ES3.1): Log: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/889643 Summary:SUSPEND:OFF test | FAIL | OFF: 0->0| RET:0 ->0 (7 sec) SUSPEND:RET test | FAIL | OFF: 0->0| RET:0 ->0 (6 sec) IDLE:OFF test | FAIL | OFF: 0->0| RET:0 ->0 (21 sec)
IDLE:RET test | FAIL | OFF: 0->0| RET:0 ->0 (21 sec) Core never hits OFF/retention. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon
Attachment:
suspend-idle.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
