Hi Nishanth, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > as discussed in [1], here is step 2 - idle path errata fixes. > this is the next rev incorporating comments from V2 post > of this series. I had a couple small comments on individual patches. In addition, in the next series, can you report the platforms it was tested on, and how it was tested (retention idle/suspend, off idle/suspend, CPUidle enabled?, etc.) I tested this series (and Jean's cleanup patch) on 34xx/n900 with retention idle & suspend and off idle & suspend with and without CPUidle enabled.) Also, when posting an updated series, can you update the version of all patches in the series, even if they are unchanged? This makes more more explicit versioning, keeps things clearer in patchwork and avoids problems with dumb mailers who thread by subject only. Also, please Cc linux-arm-kernel when posting the next version. Thanks, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
