On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 09:46:47PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Mark Brown > > It did originally but that dependency was removed to allow build > > coverage for non-OMAP users. > I'm not sure removing that dependency is worth it. There's probably a > lot of code in the kernel that can be built without meeting the > specified dependencies. Maybe there should be a way to differentiate > soft from hard dependencies for this particular use-case. But I guess > for now the lack of dependency should be ok. It's really useful for subsystem maintainers - it means you can do changes over the subsystem without having to have a build lots and lots of different configs per chip to make sure everything still at least compiles. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
