On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:18:18PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> 2010/11/2 Uwe Kleine-KÃnig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > Well, all platforms that have TWL4030_CORE will get REGULATOR_TWL4030 by >> > default, too. Â(TWL4030_CORE doesn't depend on something omapish.) > >> Yes, I think TWL4030_CORE should depend on OMAP3, but I think some >> people might not like that. That's why I wanted to make that a >> separate patch. > > It did originally but that dependency was removed to allow build > coverage for non-OMAP users. I'm not sure removing that dependency is worth it. There's probably a lot of code in the kernel that can be built without meeting the specified dependencies. Maybe there should be a way to differentiate soft from hard dependencies for this particular use-case. But I guess for now the lack of dependency should be ok. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
