Hi,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:55:45AM +0200, ext Keshava Munegowda wrote:
@@ -245,7 +245,8 @@ static unsigned ohci_omap3_fslsmode(enum
}
}
-static void ohci_omap3_tll_config(struct ohci_hcd_omap3 *omap)
+static void ohci_omap3_tll_config(struct ohci_hcd_omap3 *omap,
+ u8 tll_channel_count)
{
u32 reg;
int i;
@@ -263,7 +264,7 @@ static void ohci_omap3_tll_config(struct
* REVISIT: Only the 3-pin and 4-pin PHY modes have
* actually been tested.
*/
- for (i = 0; i < OMAP_TLL_CHANNEL_COUNT; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < tll_channel_count; i++) {
/* Enable only those channels that are actually used */
if (omap->port_mode[i] == OMAP_OHCI_PORT_MODE_UNUSED)
@@ -422,7 +423,7 @@ static int omap3_start_ohci(struct ohci_
ohci_omap_writel(omap->uhh_base, OMAP_UHH_HOSTCONFIG, reg);
dev_dbg(omap->dev, "UHH setup done, uhh_hostconfig=%x\n", reg);
- ohci_omap3_tll_config(omap);
+ ohci_omap3_tll_config(omap, OMAP_TLL_CHANNEL_COUNT);
it's still hardcoded, are you planning to change this in any way ?
Otherwise I don't see the point for this patch.
--
balbi
DefectiveByDesign.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
