On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 06:10:00PM +0530, Hemanth V wrote: > >On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 05:05:50PM +0530, Hemanth V wrote: > >>+ mutex_lock(&ddata->lock); > >>+ > >>+ error = bh1780_write(ddata, BH1780_REG_CONTROL, val, "CONTROL"); > >>+ if (error < 0) { > >>+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock); > >>+ return error; > >>+ } > >>+ > >>+ msleep(BH1780_PON_DELAY); > > > >Hmm, what do you wait for here? > > Settling time delay required before lux read out I thought so, but in fact you're just delaying the next two lines by that: > >>+ ddata->power_state = val; > >>+ mutex_unlock(&ddata->lock); ... which doesn't make sense to me. I can believe there is need to wait for the value to settle, but I think it's the wrong place where you're doing it currently. > >>+static int __devinit bh1780_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > >>+ const struct i2c_device_id *id) > >>+{ > >>+ int ret; > >>+ struct bh1780_data *ddata = NULL; > > > >The initialization isn't needed. > > This is basically added for the first goto error, to prevent > any garbage values Sorry, you're right. Ignore this comment :) Thanks, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html