On Thu, 20 May 2010, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:32:49AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:07 +0200, ext Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > > Yes, right, I should have said "they are related";) How about calling the > > > header mipi_display.h? This would then unite DSI, DCS, DBI and DPI? > > > Creating a separate header for each of these standards seems like an > > > overkill to me. We could then put MIPI CSI and CPI standards in an > > > include/media/mipi_camera.h. Not sure where to put various other MIPI > > > standards, I guess, we'll have to think about it as a need arises. > > > > mipi_display.h sounds good to me. > > if there are extra mipi standards which should be taken care of, why > not include/linux/mipi/[display.h camera.h other1.h other2.h...] ? I thought about this too, but I prefer to separate them thematically: put display standards under video/, camera under media/ etc. This way including these headers from respective drivers and platform code would look more naturally, IMHO. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
