* Steve Sakoman <sakoman@xxxxxxxxx> [100518 06:36]:
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Steve Sakoman <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Some Overo add-on boards include a second ethernet port. This patch
> > adds support for that second port.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
> > index 8848c7c..79ac414 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c
> > @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@
> >
> > #define OVERO_SMSC911X_CS 5
> > #define OVERO_SMSC911X_GPIO 176
> > +#define OVERO_SMSC911X2_CS 4
> > +#define OVERO_SMSC911X2_GPIO 65
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_ADS7846) || \
> > defined(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_ADS7846_MODULE)
> > @@ -137,6 +139,16 @@ static struct resource overo_smsc911x_resources[] = {
> > },
> > };
> >
> > +static struct resource overo_smsc911x2_resources[] = {
> > + {
> > + .name = "smsc911x2-memory",
> > + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ | IORESOURCE_IRQ_LOWLEVEL,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > static struct smsc911x_platform_config overo_smsc911x_config = {
> > .irq_polarity = SMSC911X_IRQ_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW,
> > .irq_type = SMSC911X_IRQ_TYPE_OPEN_DRAIN,
> > @@ -146,7 +158,7 @@ static struct smsc911x_platform_config overo_smsc911x_config = {
> >
> > static struct platform_device overo_smsc911x_device = {
> > .name = "smsc911x",
> > - .id = -1,
> > + .id = 0,
> > .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(overo_smsc911x_resources),
> > .resource = overo_smsc911x_resources,
> > .dev = {
> >
> > --
>
> I just noticed that somehow a good portion of my original patch got
> dropped in this version!
It seems to be a patchwork issue, note how some of that got into the commit
message:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/91277/
Might be worth investigating further, there's the mbox link there, maybe
that contains some clues.
> Original:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg26350.html
>
> How would you like to handle getting the missing chuncks?
Can you please post your fix as a reply to this thread? I've already
merged the original patch into omap-for-linus, this is too late to
start messing with that.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
