"Sripathy, Vishwanath" <vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx> writes: >> All that being said, why is the voltage level being programmed here? >> >> It seems to me that all of this errata handling should be >> self-contained in the voltage layer. > > I am not sure if entire errata can be contained in voltage > layer. This is because we are performing DVFS operation in CPU Idle > path which involves both Frequency and Voltage scaling. So currently > this has been done in resource34xx.c where DVFS is implemented. What I mean is that there seems to be no good reason to be calling these from pm34xx.c, they should be called where voltage scaling is done. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
