> -----Original Message----- > From: Varadarajan, Charulatha > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 2:24 PM > To: 'felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx' > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nayak, Rajendra; paul@xxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/8] OMAP2:GPIO:Add support for early platform gpio device > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 12:56 PM > > To: Varadarajan, Charulatha > > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nayak, Rajendra; paul@xxxxxxxxx; > tony@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] OMAP2:GPIO:Add support for early platform gpio device > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:23:54PM +0200, ext Charulatha V wrote: > > >+static inline struct gpio_bank *omap2_get_gpio_bank(int gpio, > > >+ struct gpio_bank *gpio_bank) > > >+{ > > >+ if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) > > >+ return &gpio_bank[gpio >> 5]; > > >+ BUG(); > > > > so if we build support omap 2420 and 3430 we will have a BUG() ?? > > Multi-OMAP build will not give a BUG(). If this function is called during non-3430 > OMAP arch, it will have a BUG(). A correction - it would give BUG() for non-24xx OMAP, if called. > > > > > -- > > balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
