> -----Original Message----- > From: Nayak, Rajendra > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 12:25 PM > To: Paul Walmsley; Varadarajan, Charulatha > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; > khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2 RFC]OMAP3430: hwmod FW for GPIO > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley > > Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 3:31 AM > > To: Varadarajan, Charulatha > > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; > > khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 RFC]OMAP3430: hwmod FW for GPIO > > > > By the way: > > > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote: > > > > > They are boot tested on SDP 3430 and compile tested > > > for OMAP 2420 and 2430. > > > > This part is really offensively misleading. It does not > > matter whether > > the code has been compile-tested on OMAP24xx if it could > > never actually > > run on OMAP24xx. > > Charu, > > You can mention explicitely in the cover letter that these patches > would break omap2 functionality, since no hwmod struct's are added > for omap2. I agree with Paul that saying they are compile tested might > mislead someone in believing that these patches are tested on omap2. > Rajendra & Paul, Ok. I will do the needful while sending out next version of the patch series. > regards, > Rajendra > > > > > > > - Paul > > -- > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
