> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley > Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 3:31 AM > To: Varadarajan, Charulatha > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; > khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 RFC]OMAP3430: hwmod FW for GPIO > > By the way: > > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Varadarajan, Charulatha wrote: > > > They are boot tested on SDP 3430 and compile tested > > for OMAP 2420 and 2430. > > This part is really offensively misleading. It does not > matter whether > the code has been compile-tested on OMAP24xx if it could > never actually > run on OMAP24xx. Charu, You can mention explicitely in the cover letter that these patches would break omap2 functionality, since no hwmod struct's are added for omap2. I agree with Paul that saying they are compile tested might mislead someone in believing that these patches are tested on omap2. regards, Rajendra > > > - Paul > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
