Hello Vishwanath,
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Vishwanath BS wrote:
> Frequency Selection field is no longer valid for OMAP3630. So remove
> references to that.
The code in the patch is fine, but this patch description doesn't seem to
have anything to do with the code. Please fix and resend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll.c
> index 4f5570e..e3c6008 100755
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll.c
> @@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ int omap3_noncore_dpll_program(struct clk *clk, u16 m, u8 n, u16 freqsel)
> /* 3430 ES2 TRM: 4.7.6.9 DPLL Programming Sequence */
> _omap3_noncore_dpll_bypass(clk);
>
> - /* Set jitter correction */
> - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> + /* Set jitter correction. No jitter correction for OMAP4 and 3630 */
> + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap3630()) {
> v = __raw_readl(dd->control_reg);
> v &= ~dd->freqsel_mask;
> v |= freqsel << __ffs(dd->freqsel_mask);
> @@ -429,8 +429,8 @@ int omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> if (dd->last_rounded_rate == 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - /* No freqsel on OMAP4 */
> - if (!cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> + /* No freqsel on OMAP4 and OMAP3630 */
> + if (!cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap3630()) {
> freqsel = _omap3_dpll_compute_freqsel(clk,
> dd->last_rounded_n);
> if (!freqsel)
> --
> 1.5.6.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
