"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> writes: [...] >> > >> > Probably not something ot be attached in this patch, but... >> > >> > I'm a bit curious about something: >> > >> > Why touching omap3_features in OMAP4? >> > >> > Isn't there a omap4_features? >> > >> > Or even better, an omap_features? > > This "is_feature" suppose to take care of Errata's also, is it? "It's not a bug it's a feature." :) > This is errata more than a feature..... We better differentiate in > this regard I agree, I have a hard time calling this empty fifo read fault a "feature." We need a similar thing for errata. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
