Re: Question on OPP table handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sanjeev, All,
Cousson, Benoit had written, on 10/06/2009 07:52 AM, the following:
Yes, it is true but you might have to disable dynamically some OPP (like OPP5 and OPP4) for thermal management reason. The way the resource is handled today, you cannot force the reduction of the frequency in case of thermal issue.
I agree that there might be more elegant way to deal with that, but we can take advantage of disabling dynamically any OPP to do it.
I would like to introduce OPP tables for 3630, but I will be dependent on http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=125442020209267&w=2

Let me know how I can introduce the following into l-o + l-o pm. ( I suppose l-o first…):
http://dev.omapzoom.org/?p=integration/kernel-omap3.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap3-opp.h;h=ac3ae6f219b37760de00e8e469ae3911d02f0304;hb=refs/heads/sync_wake-up3630#l74

Not sure of the status and plan on this. Could we sync on this?

--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux