Typo I meant Put all the OPP tables for different CPUs (instead ofOPPs) in __initdata. Copy the run time detected CPU's OPP table in memory. Others get discarded!" >-----Original Message----- >From: Menon, Nishanth >Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:34 PM >To: Dasgupta, Romit >Cc: Premi, Sanjeev; Cousson, Benoit; Kevin H; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: Question on OPP table handling > >Dasgupta, Romit had written, on 10/06/2009 07:00 AM, the following: >>> Couple of opinions on why a list with disabled/invalid marker might not >>> make sense as a grand unified OPP table: >>> a) it is no better than a list implementation >>> b) it is a waste of memory. >> [Romit] Put all the OPP tables for different OPPs in __initdata. Copy the runtime >detected CPU's OPP table in memory. Others get discarded! >> >I like this approach.. takers? > >-- >Regards, >Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
