Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > Kevin Hilman had written, on 10/05/2009 12:29 PM, the following: >> Nishanth Menon <menon.nishanth@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].is_valid = >>>> + (gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG7)) >>>> + & GPMC_CONFIG7_CSVALID; >>>> + if (gpmc_context.cs_context[i].is_valid) { >>>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config1 = >>>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1); >>>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config2 = >>>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG2); >>>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config3 = >>>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG3); >>>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config4 = >>>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG4); >>>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config5 = >>>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG5); >>>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config6 = >>>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG6); >>>> + gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config7 = >>>> + gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG7); >>>> + } >>>> >>> here is a theoretical bug: >>> 1: GPMC, 1, 2, 3 4 5 configured 6 7 not configured. >>> 2. Save and restore 1: save and restore variables which are static will >>> contain 1-5 and not 6&7 >>> 3. next I disable 2,3 >>> 3. save will save 1,4,5 BUT my variable will contain 1,2,3,4,5 -> >>> restore will rename 2,3 (which I did not intend).. >> >> Not sure I follow the problem here. What do you mean by "rename". >> The saved context will have values for 2 and 3, but the is_valid >> flag will not be set, so they shouldn't be used. > > My bad.. s/rename/enable/ for 2,3 ->definitely not something I would > like to see. I must be missing something here. I don't see how the restore will do anything if 2,3 have been disabled (by gpmc_cs_free()). AFAICT, the save hook will have cleared the is_valid flag, so the restore will do nothing. For clarity, I'm also going to modify this patch to set the is_valid flag using gpmc_cs_mem_enabled() which make it more clear that it's using the same check as gpmc_cs_[enable|disable]_mem() Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html