Kevin Hilman had written, on 10/05/2009 12:29 PM, the following:
Nishanth Menon <menon.nishanth@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
+ gpmc_context.cs_context[i].is_valid =
+ (gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG7))
+ & GPMC_CONFIG7_CSVALID;
+ if (gpmc_context.cs_context[i].is_valid) {
+ gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config1 =
+ gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG1);
+ gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config2 =
+ gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG2);
+ gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config3 =
+ gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG3);
+ gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config4 =
+ gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG4);
+ gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config5 =
+ gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG5);
+ gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config6 =
+ gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG6);
+ gpmc_context.cs_context[i].config7 =
+ gpmc_cs_read_reg(i, GPMC_CS_CONFIG7);
+ }
here is a theoretical bug:
1: GPMC, 1, 2, 3 4 5 configured 6 7 not configured.
2. Save and restore 1: save and restore variables which are static will
contain 1-5 and not 6&7
3. next I disable 2,3
3. save will save 1,4,5 BUT my variable will contain 1,2,3,4,5 ->
restore will rename 2,3 (which I did not intend)..
Not sure I follow the problem here. What do you mean by "rename".
The saved context will have values for 2 and 3, but the is_valid
flag will not be set, so they shouldn't be used.
My bad.. s/rename/enable/ for 2,3 ->definitely not something I would
like to see.
Rajendra was the original author of these, so maybe I'm not fully
understanding here, but disabling a GPMC looks to me like it
will disable both the save and restore.
Yes, anyone else has an opinion, please pop them here.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
