On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 03:16:44PM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote: > On 12/17/24 3:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > This isn't just a naming convention thing AFACIT, the MFD registers the > > new name so the driver wouldn't previously have loaded. How did this > > ever work? > It matches based on the platform device .id_table[0] which does have > "tps65219-regulator" listed, the driver .name itself is only used > as a last fallback when there is no .id_table. Ah, there's not enough context in the diff to show the ID table.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
