On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 02:45:24PM -0600, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote:
> Follow the same naming convention in tps6594-regulator.c with
> tpsxxx-regulator instead of tpsxxx-pmic.
> static struct platform_driver tps65219_regulator_driver = {
> .driver = {
> - .name = "tps65219-pmic",
> + .name = "tps65219-regulator",
> .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
This isn't just a naming convention thing AFACIT, the MFD registers the
new name so the driver wouldn't previously have loaded. How did this
ever work?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
