>-----Original Message----- >From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nayak, Rajendra >Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:39 AM >To: Paul Walmsley; Shilimkar, Santosh >Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cousson, Benoit; sakari.poussa@xxxxxxxxx >Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: OMAP4: PM: PRM/CM module offsets >for OMAP4 > >Paul, > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxx] >>Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:17 AM >>To: Shilimkar, Santosh >>Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >>linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cousson, Benoit; sakari.poussa@xxxxxxxxx >>Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: OMAP4: PM: PRM/CM module offsets >>for OMAP4 >> >>Hello Santosh, >> >>On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: >> >>> > I'd also like to see the full names of the PRCM submodules, e.g., >>> > >>> > OMAP4430_CM2_RESTORE_CM2_MOD >>> > >>> > rather than just >>> > >>> > OMAP4430_CM2_RESTORE_MOD >>> >>> Not sure what you mean by __full__ name here. You are adding >>a redundant CM2 in the name here. >> >>Yes, for the above example, it looks pretty redundant, doesn't >>it. But >>what about: >> >>OMAP4430_PRM_WKUP_CM_MOD > >There are only 2 such instances of these where in WKUP_CM and >EMU_CM and >part of PRM module. There are no such instances in CM1 or CM2. >To take care of 2 of these we would have 60 odd which would >look redundant >and module names as along as this OMAP4430_PRM_ALWAYS_ON_PRM_MOD. Just to be clear what I mean.. this is what it would look like with 2 exceptions #define OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_MOD 0x0000 #define OMAP4430_PRM_CKGEN_MOD 0x0100 #define OMAP4430_PRM_MPU_MOD 0x0300 #define OMAP4430_PRM_DSP_MOD 0x0400 #define OMAP4430_PRM_ABE_MOD 0x0500 #define OMAP4430_PRM_ALWAYS_ON_MOD 0x0600 #define OMAP4430_PRM_CORE_MOD 0x0700 #define OMAP4430_PRM_IVAHD_MOD 0x0F00 #define OMAP4430_PRM_CAM_MOD 0x1000 #define OMAP4430_PRM_DSS_MOD 0x1100 #define OMAP4430_PRM_GFX_MOD 0x1200 #define OMAP4430_PRM_L3INIT_MOD 0x1300 #define OMAP4430_PRM_L4PER_MOD 0x1400 #define OMAP4430_PRM_CEFUSE_MOD 0x1600 #define OMAP4430_PRM_WKUP_MOD 0x1700 #define OMAP4430_PRM_WKUP_CM_MOD 0x1800 /* exception */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_MOD 0x1900 #define OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_MOD 0x1A00 /* exception */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_DEVICE_MOD 0x1B00 #define OMAP4430_PRM_RESTORE_MOD 0x1E00 #define OMAP4430_PRM_INSTR_MOD 0x1F00 And this with your way of naming.. #define OMAP4430_PRM_OCP_SOCKET_PRM_MOD 0x0000 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_CKGEN_PRM_MOD 0x0100 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_MPU_PRM_MOD 0x0300 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_DSP_PRM_MOD 0x0400 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_ABE_PRM_MOD 0x0500 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_ALWAYS_ON_PRM_MOD 0x0600 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_CORE_PRM_MOD 0x0700 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_IVAHD_PRM_MOD 0x0F00 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_CAM_PRM_MOD 0x1000 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_DSS_PRM_MOD 0x1100 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_GFX_PRM_MOD 0x1200 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_L3INIT_PRM_MOD 0x1300 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_L4PER_PRM_MOD 0x1400 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_CEFUSE_PRM_MOD 0x1600 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_WKUP_PRM_MOD 0x1700 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_WKUP_CM_MOD 0x1800 #define OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_PRM_MOD 0x1900 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_EMU_CM_MOD 0x1A00 #define OMAP4430_PRM_DEVICE_PRM_MOD 0x1B00 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_RESTORE_PRM_MOD 0x1E00 /* redundant */ #define OMAP4430_PRM_INSTR_PRM_MOD 0x1F00 /* redundant */ And this is just for the PRM modules, there would be all modules in CM1 and CM2 with redundunt additional CM1/CM2 even though there are no exceptions there. > >If its really confusing and hard to remember that these belong >to PRM we can always >have exceptions in naming, and we have had exceptions in >3430 as well. There are modules common to 2430/3430 which are >named differently >as well as modules only in ES2 which are named differently. > >> >>As my original message mentioned. >> >>Do you still feel that is redundant? >> >> >>- Paul >> >>-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >linux-omap" in >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
