RE: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: OMAP4: PM: PRM/CM module offsets for OMAP4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rajendra,

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:

> >There are only 2 such instances of these where in WKUP_CM and 
> >EMU_CM and
> >part of PRM module. There are no such instances in CM1 or CM2.
> >To take care of 2 of these we would have 60 odd which would 
> >look redundant
> >and module names as along as this OMAP4430_PRM_ALWAYS_ON_PRM_MOD.
> 
> Just to be clear what I mean..

> this is what it would look like with 2 exceptions

...

> And this with your way of naming..

...

> And this is just for the PRM modules, there would be all modules in CM1 
> and CM2 with redundunt additional CM1/CM2 even though there are no 
> exceptions there.

Yes, sure, I get your point.

Whatever we do, it should be as consistent as possible, and it should be 
behavior that can be rationally programmed into the autogeneration 
scripts.


- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux