Hi Krzysztof,
On 07/03/23 14:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/03/2023 05:57, Md Danish Anwar wrote:
>>>> +allOf:
>>>> + - $ref: /schemas/remoteproc/ti,pru-consumer.yaml#
>>>> +
>>>> +properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + enum:
>>>> + - ti,am654-icssg-prueth # for AM65x SoC family
>>>> +
>>>> + ti,sram:
>>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>>> + description:
>>>> + phandle to MSMC SRAM node
>>>
>>> I believe we have a standard 'sram' property to point to SRAM nodes
>>> assuming this is just mmio-sram or similar.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, we have standard 'sram' property but Krzysztof had asked me to make the
>> sram property vendor specific in last revision of this series.
>
> Sorry about that. I missed that we already have a 'sram'. The question
> remains whether this is a phandle to MMIO SRAM or similar (sram.yaml).
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
The SRAM that we are using here is phandle to MMIO-SRAM only. In the example
section you can see, sram node points to msmc_ram (ti,sram = <&msmc_ram>;) And
msmc_ram has compatible as "mmio-sram" in k3-am65-main.dtsi [1].
msmc_ram: sram@70000000 {
compatible = "mmio-sram";
reg = <0x0 0x70000000 0x0 0x200000>;
So I can use 'sram' property as there is no need to make this as ti specific.
Let me know if it seems good to you.
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi?h=v6.3-rc1#n11
--
Thanks and Regards,
Danish.
