* Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [090617 07:19]: > On 09 Jun 17, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > > Amit Kucheria wrote: > >> Reset twl4030.h to what is upstream. Patches to restore twl4030_power > >> functionality will follow directly to lkml. > >> > >> > > development against upstream is great. But what will be left for > > this mail list if we send all patches directly to lkml? > > I think the idea is that (and Tony should correct me here if I'm wrong) > core OMAP code is handled here while peripheral drivers will all go > directly to their respective susbsystem maintainers upstream. Yeah, so for the twl4030 patches that's mostly drivers/mfd. If we pile up things to linux-omap, that code never goes anywhere and keeps piling up! And now for the first time ever, we have pretty much all we need working in the mainline kernel! So that should be the stable base for any distros or prodcuts starting with 2.6.31. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
