On 09 Jun 17, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > Amit Kucheria wrote: >> Reset twl4030.h to what is upstream. Patches to restore twl4030_power >> functionality will follow directly to lkml. >> >> > development against upstream is great. But what will be left for > this mail list if we send all patches directly to lkml? I think the idea is that (and Tony should correct me here if I'm wrong) core OMAP code is handled here while peripheral drivers will all go directly to their respective susbsystem maintainers upstream. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amit Kucheria, Kernel Developer, Verdurent ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
