* Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> [190409 05:21]: > > > On 09/04/19 9:29 AM, Keerthy wrote: > > > > > > On 08/04/19 11:13 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [190408 10:26]: > > > > * Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> [190402 21:57]: > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > > > > > > > > * Exported out omap_rtc_poweroff_program function & removed > > > > > the patch to add a generic rtc interface as it is specific > > > > > to am43 at the moment. > > > > > > > > Thanks I'll be applying this series into omap-for-v5.2/am4-pm > > > > today. > > > > > > Sorry correction for the branch named above. I noticed a build > > > warning and folded in the following fix. We need to return > > > -EINVAL if tm2bcd() fails like we do elsewhere in the driver. > > > > > > So I just pushed out a new branch omap-for-v5.2/am4-pm-v2. > > > Please just ignore the earlier branch omap-for-v5.2/am4-pm. > > > > Thanks Tony! > > Tony, > > Seems like your for-next is a little behind. Hence you noticed the > compilation error which i did not notice. The rtc driver patch i formatted > from your for-next branch does not apply cleanly on linux-next as there are > more patches already applied by Alexandre on next. > > So the patch you made to return -EINVAL is no longer needed on latest next. Yeah I noticed there's now a minor conflict with the rtc tree changes, that's trivial to resolve though. Regards, Tony
