* Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [190409 07:06]: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 2:17 PM Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 09/04/19 10:37 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 2:00 PM Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 08/04/19 9:48 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> * Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [190408 07:56]: > > >>>> <generated/ti-pm-asm-offsets.h> is only generated and included > > >>>> by arch/arm/mach-omap2/, so it does not need to reside in the > > >>>> globally visible include/generated/. > > >>>> > > >>>> I moved and renamed it to arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm-asm-offsets.h > > >>>> since the prefix 'omap2-' is just redundant in mach-omap2/. > > >>>> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>>> --- > > >>>> > > >>>> Can this be applied to ARM-SOC tree in a series? > > >>>> (with Ack from the platform sub-maintainer.) > > >>>> > > >>>> ti-pm-asm-offsets.h does not need to reside in include/generated/, > > >>>> but you may ask "Why must it get out of include/generated/?" > > >>>> > > >>>> My main motivation is to avoid a race condition in the currently > > >>>> proposed patch: > > >>>> > > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1052763/ > > >>>> > > >>>> This patch tries to embed some build artifacts into the kernel. > > >>>> > > >>>> If arch/arm/mach-omap2/ and kernel/ are built at the same time, > > >>>> it may embed a truncated file. > > >>> > > >>> Looks like a nice improvment to me, adding Keerthy and Dave to Cc. > > >>> > > >>> Keerthy and Dave, can you please test this series with am3 and am4 > > >>> PM code? > > >> > > >> Tested for Deep Sleep0 on AM33xx Beaglebone-black. > > >> Tested for Deep Sleep0 on AM437x-gp-evm. > > >> > > >> Applied this on top of Tony's for-next with the gpio patch > > >> required for RTC+DDR mode on am437x-gp-evm. > > > > > > Was it applied to TI tree? > > > > > > If so ... > > > > > > Arnd, Olof, > > > Please just ignore this patch > > > since it looks it was already applied to TI tree. > > > > Masahiro Yamada, > > > > No i manually applied this on top. > > > > Regards, > > Keerthy > > Keerthy, > Sorry, I misunderstood. > > You just applied it to your local tree for testing. > > Then, I still think it is better to > apply this series in a correct order. > > The reason I sent this in a series was > to make sure asm-offset headers are correctly > cleaned up. Yes looks good to me: Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
