"Hald, Ulrik Bech" <ubh@xxxxxx> writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 9:45 AM >> To: Hald, Ulrik Bech >> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP3:WDT:Enable IVA, SECURE and minor bugfixes >> >> Ulrik Bech Hald <ubh@xxxxxx> writes: >> >> > This patch series enables support for IVA and SECURE >> > WDTs, available on omap34xx. >> > For omap34xx devices the WDT will be accessible >> > (when present) through: >> > SECURE: /dev/watchdog1 >> > MPU: /dev/watchdog2 >> > IVA: /dev/watchdog3 >> > >> > For devices older than omap34xx only MPU WDT is present >> > and will be accessible through /dev/watchdog >> >> I think you should make the MPU WDT the first one since it will always >> be present. > > The reason, why I numbered them as above, is to make them match the OMAP34xx TRM WDT numbering scheme, where SECURE WDT=WDT1, MPU WDT=WDT2 and IVA WDT=WDT3. My thought was that it would introduce more confusion to change the numbers in /dev/ to something else, although I did consider your point. > Do you still think I should change the numbers? Yes. Personally, I don't think the TRM should influence userspace visible nodes in this case. I would rather see the watchdog that exists on all platforms be the first one. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
