Paul, Gražvydas,
Ok, thanks!
Here is a patch that addresses the Pandora's use of 2 SDRAM chip selects.
It applies on top of 'OMAP3: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects'.
Is that OK? It has been build tested only.
Regards,
Jean
>From 297a0b09267fc1a0ae4428771ff54b73b27d5bbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Pihet <jpihet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:49:53 +0200
Subject: OMAP3 Pandora: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects
This allows the self refresh to work correctly on
Pandora.
Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jpihet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c | 8 +++++++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c
index 05ab99e..ba015b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include <mach/gpmc.h>
#include <mach/hardware.h>
#include <mach/nand.h>
+#include <mach/mux.h>
#include <mach/usb.h>
#include <mach/mcspi.h>
@@ -220,7 +221,8 @@ static int __init omap3pandora_i2c_init(void)
static void __init omap3pandora_init_irq(void)
{
- omap2_init_common_hw(mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params, NULL,
+ omap2_init_common_hw(mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params,
+ mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
omap_init_irq();
omap_gpio_init();
@@ -307,6 +309,10 @@ static void __init omap3pandora_init(void)
usb_ehci_init();
omap3pandora_flash_init();
omap3pandora_ads7846_init();
+
+ /* Ensure SDRC pins are mux'd for self-refresh */
+ omap_cfg_reg(H16_34XX_SDRC_CKE0);
+ omap_cfg_reg(H17_34XX_SDRC_CKE1);
}
static void __init omap3pandora_map_io(void)
--
1.6.2.5.168.g3823
On Saturday 06 June 2009 12:50:42 Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Paul Walmsley<paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Jean Pihet wrote:
> >> Some notes:
> >> - all calls to omap2_init_common_hw have been adapted in the board
> >> files. it looks like 2430SDP and Pandora board files are broken since
> >> they use only one param. Can that be checked on those boards?
> >
> > Yep, builds with those two boards are broken on the PM branch, and it
> > looks like your patch fixes both.
> >
> > Gražyvdas, looks like Pandora might use 2 SDRAM chipselects also?
>
> Yes it does, it uses different part than Beagle rev C (256/512
> RAM/NAND instead of 256/256), but RAM portion should be identical I
> guess.
>
>
> Gražvydas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
