On 01/07/2018 03:34 PM, Matthijs van Duin wrote: > On 2 January 2018 at 22:35, Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> wrote: >> A simple 'hello world' can be achieved if using the proper TI BIOS >> versions, and adding a new platform to some of the existing rpmsg-based >> RTOS-side IPC code bases present in public trees. I have to double >> check, but I believe the latest TI tools (SYS/BIOS, XDC etc) have >> dropped the support for the C64P family (DSPs present in OMAP3, OMAP4 >> and OMAP5), so you would have to play around with some older versions of >> the RTOS and IPC code bases to get going on OMAP3. > > OMAP4 and OMAP5 have a Tesla DSP (C64T), which is (annoyingly) no > longer supported in TI C6000 CGT v8. OMAP3 has a regular C64+, which > is still supported by the latest compilers. I don't know about other > TI tools, but I don't see why they would no longer support it. FYI, all C64x+ support was dropped from SYS/BIOS 6.45 onwards based on the Device Support listed in the Release Notes. regards Suman > > Note that C64+ is architecturally basically identical to the C674 on > the OMAP-L13x, differing only in the absence of floating-point > instructions. > > Matthijs > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
