On 14 August 2017 at 19:47, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just to recap on this, we need to first fix up any related issues > and then applying this should be trivial. Mostly I'm worried about > what all hidden dependencies we have, mosty I want to see what > examples for problems Dave comes up for PM on am335x :) Thanks for the update. I will try to send a patch which will handle a missing node as it would be status = "disable" (after the rework). I would like to do this to fulfill what Rob said status = "disabled" should be threaded the same as the node is missing. At the moment a missing node will print a stack trace. Regards, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
