On 12/08, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Ladislav, > > On Thursday 08 Dec 2016 08:11:55 Ladislav Michl wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 04:16:54PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 12/05, Tero Kristo wrote: > > > > The compiler should ideally generate same size code for these both. > > > > Personally, I don't mind which version goes in; I'd say both are as > > > > readable. > > > > > > > > Stephen, Mike, is one of you going to pick this up? I don't think I > > > > have anything else to pull due to the ongoing discussion with the > > > > other pending stuff. > > > > > > I have no problem picking up either version. Please send it with > > > the appropriate tags added and I can merge it. > > > > Here it is for your convenience. Of course I'd like to see smaller code > > to go in as exactly those sneaky tiny incremental code size increases > > made Linux kernel unusable on most of my hardware over time ;-) > > However, if Laurent is unhappy with changes I made, I will not object > > merging his version any more. > > I'd rather keep my version, thank you. Let's not spend time chasing bytes. > Ok so I'll go apply the original patch v3 in this thread and dig out the tags myself. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
