Re: [PATCH v3] clk: ti: omap36xx: Work around sprz319 advisory 2.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/05, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 05/12/16 13:08, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >Hi Ladislav,
> >
> >On Monday 05 Dec 2016 10:36:49 Ladislav Michl wrote:
> >>On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:46:43AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>>On Monday 05 Dec 2016 09:22:10 Ladislav Michl wrote:
> >>
> >>[snip]
> >>
> >>>>Table 36 list two options with 26MHz clocks: m=443, n=11 and m=480, n=12
> >>>>with a statement: "The choice between these two options with a 26 MHz
> >>>>input should be based on characterization on the end system."
> >>>>
> >>>>Shall we care about that?
> >>>
> >>>I'd like to, but at the moment I don't see how. Proposals are welcome :-)
> >>>I
> >>
> >>One of proposals raised earlier was DT property, but that idea was scratched
> >>later.
> >
> >It might not be such a bad idea, given that the decision should be made based
> >on the characterization of the whole system. One could argue that such
> >platform information could have its place in DT.
> >
> >>>don't think addressing that issue should be a blocker to get this patch
> >>>merged though.
> >>
> >>Of course not. I'd like to even see it in stable ;-)
> >>
> >>[snip]
> >>
> >>>I had tried that, but I find the code less readable :-S
> >>
> >>Oh... Please reconsider (I really do not like that extra test and extra
> >>assignment to local variables (also I had 'precomputed' as mixed definition,
> >>but Tero did not quite like that)) :-)
> >
> >I still like to favour code readability when possible (especially when the
> >compiler should optimize both versions the same way). I'm not the maintainer
> >of this driver though, so I'll let Tero decides what he prefers.
> 
> The compiler should ideally generate same size code for these both.
> Personally, I don't mind which version goes in; I'd say both are as
> readable.
> 
> Stephen, Mike, is one of you going to pick this up? I don't think I
> have anything else to pull due to the ongoing discussion with the
> other pending stuff.
> 

I have no problem picking up either version. Please send it with
the appropriate tags added and I can merge it.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux