On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [090430 11:56]: >> * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [090430 07:06]: >> > * vimal singh <vimalsingh@xxxxxx> [090429 23:33]: >> > > 'gpmc-onenand.c' is still confusing name. This is not going to used in >> > > all boards anyway. >> > >> > Why do you think this cannot be used for all boards? >> > >> > The GPMC timings are totally based on the onenand chip features. >> >> And these two patches make omap3430sdp to work with the gpmc-onenand >> code. Sync mode does not work, but it seems like it was never enabled >> for sdp anyways. >> >> Similar patch should work for other boards too. > > Setting the sync_write depends on flags and processor, not just flags. > Here's a fixed version of this patch. OK, these both patches seems good to me... Earlier I was in impression that this patch series is basically to remove board-*-flash.c files. Since in 3430sdp boards we find out 'CS' number for flash devices dynamically in different versions of boards. So, I was confused. > Tony > --- Regards, \/ | |\/| /-\ |_ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
