On Wednesday 22 of April 2009 17:38:20 twebb wrote: > > The L-O tree is already about 2.6.30, so you're essentially 3 > > revisions out and you're just setting yourself up for a bunch of work > > to port numerous changes into your Kernel. > > > > And as Greg KH would probably say, 5 months in Kernel development land > > is a really long period of time. :) > > > > -- Ashwin > > Thanks for the clarification. Maybe you could help me understand > something about the l-o tree. From what I see on the git, the latest > tagged l-o version is 2.6.30-rc2, but my understanding is that only > tags that include "-omapX" have had the latest omap patches applied to > it. So I'm not sure what the best choice would be for the 'newest > kernel I can find'. Maybe another way to ask this is which would > offer better, reasonably stable, omap support: tagged tree > v2.6.28-omap1 or v2.6.29, or head omap-2.6.28 or omap-2.6.29 or > omap-fixes? I'm not an omap person anymore (though I'll miss working on my omap devices). But, according to README[1], the git address is [2] and you should be fine just doing git clone [3] on it. [1] http://www.muru.com/linux/omap/README_OMAP_GIT [2] http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git;a=summary [3] git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap-2.6.git > > Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
