> > The L-O tree is already about 2.6.30, so you're essentially 3 > revisions out and you're just setting yourself up for a bunch of work > to port numerous changes into your Kernel. > > And as Greg KH would probably say, 5 months in Kernel development land > is a really long period of time. :) > > -- Ashwin > Thanks for the clarification. Maybe you could help me understand something about the l-o tree. From what I see on the git, the latest tagged l-o version is 2.6.30-rc2, but my understanding is that only tags that include "-omapX" have had the latest omap patches applied to it. So I'm not sure what the best choice would be for the 'newest kernel I can find'. Maybe another way to ask this is which would offer better, reasonably stable, omap support: tagged tree v2.6.28-omap1 or v2.6.29, or head omap-2.6.28 or omap-2.6.29 or omap-fixes? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
