On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:00:31AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> [090423 01:35]: > > Hello Russell, > > > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:01:29PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > > The patch also renames clk_init_one() to clk_preinit() to > > > > distinguish its function from clk_init() and the individual struct clk > > > > init functions. > > > > > > That's rather unnecessary. 'clk_init_one' is already unique. In the > > > long run, it's clk_init that needs to go. > > > > Even if clk_init() were to disappear, the struct clk .init function > > pointer would still be present. clk->init() performs a very different > > kind of initialization than clk_init_one(). > > I'm OK doing the rename in this fix. The original naming can cause > confusion while reading the code. Well I'm not, and I want to discuss it some more. And I'm sending Linus a pull request tonight, so I'm dropping the OMAP stuff from that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
