I was following the thread (http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=123540972404602&w=2) and am confused by one of the statements. Felipe, you say the test of the ST_USBTTL is wrong and suggested changing to test for '0'. That means the TRM is wrong? It says ST_USBTTL = 1 = USB TTL cannot be accessed, but your saying ST_USBTTL = 0 = USB TTL cannot be accessed. How did you determine this? I was looking into because of problems with accessing the transceiver from the EHCI host - and was trying to confirm all USB-related clocks were in place and enabled. I see the ST_USBTTL bit clearing as expected (according to the TRM), so your comment and suggested code change are puzzling. twebb -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
