Re: core not going off

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Nishanth,

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 06:20 AM, Ryan wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am still seeing core domain to be ON on a 4460 board. The following
>> is the prcm debug output.
>>
>> I am not sure whats keeping the core domain to be ON. I compared with
>> a system on which core has hit retention. But could not find anything
>> different other than some are IDLE vs Disabled.
>>
>> Can anyone help me on this please?
>
> Does not look like upstream kernel for sure.. and the kernel patch
> which optimized the log does not seem merged (3.4ish I think)..
>     PD_CORE curr=ON prev=ON logic=ON
>
> On a quick glance, All the sub PDs look to be at least in retention -
> which is the entry criteria for OFF mode on O4.
>
> There are many reasons that prevent this, the best debug I have
> personally done is with h/w observability signals. Typically, there'd
> be a pending interrupt etc that prevent from going to off mode. One
> other time I have hit MR4 event from EMIF for PoP memory generating
> EMIF temp event another was a bad AVS irq disable (pending interrupt
> again)... other times I had seen clk_out active, so off entry gets
> started, but stops short of osc stop prior to off entry, and OFF is
> not triggered by PRCM.
>
> There should be a timing diagram in TRM for off mode sequence. if
> voltages never transitioned, then it is probably way ahead of DEV_OFF
> entry condition in PRCM state machine.. JTAG and h/w observability
> will be your best bet.
>

Been trying to achieve retention state. Are there any more prcm registers
which might help assist in debugging?

> it is a pretty hard state to achieve, once achieved, even more harder
> to recover from - when I used to work in product kernels, we had
> significant burden in getting this to work due to the complex
> interactions involved.
>
> I doubt folks in the list will be able to debug based on basic log..
> If you do not have a TI support person already involved, I suggest
> using e2e.ti.com for further discussion
>

e2e is closed for omap4 discussions.


Thanks

> --
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux