Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:36 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
Liam Girdwood wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:48 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
On Friday 06 March 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
Would it make sense to make this platform data so that if a given board
requires running the chip like this it can be enabled for those boards
but it's not something people might turn on because it seems useful?
Let's hear if it's actually needed, first. :)
I coded those tables so that it would be easy to kick in the
support for out-of-spec operation if it's really needed. But
so far we don't know that it's needed, and I'd rather it not
be too easy to run like that.
I've now reverted this patch.
TI say we can use VAUX3 at 3V and expect no problems:
http://community.ti.com/forums/p/3777/14574.aspx
So how do we do it?
I'd prefer seeing the reply from Ghandar to David's last question before
accepting this patch again. It's still not 100% clear from TI, things
seem a little bit muddled as to whether 3V will be guaranteed to work on
*all* shipped devices.
Ghandar has responded. What would you like to do?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
