On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:36 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote: > Liam Girdwood wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:48 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > >> On Friday 06 March 2009, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Would it make sense to make this platform data so that if a given board > >>> requires running the chip like this it can be enabled for those boards > >>> but it's not something people might turn on because it seems useful? > >> Let's hear if it's actually needed, first. :) > >> > >> I coded those tables so that it would be easy to kick in the > >> support for out-of-spec operation if it's really needed. But > >> so far we don't know that it's needed, and I'd rather it not > >> be too easy to run like that. > >> > > > > I've now reverted this patch. > > TI say we can use VAUX3 at 3V and expect no problems: > > http://community.ti.com/forums/p/3777/14574.aspx > > So how do we do it? I'd prefer seeing the reply from Ghandar to David's last question before accepting this patch again. It's still not 100% clear from TI, things seem a little bit muddled as to whether 3V will be guaranteed to work on *all* shipped devices. Thanks Liam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
