[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2: possible division by 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In linus' git tree the functions can be found at:
vi arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c +200	- tusb6010_platform_retime()
vi arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c +94		- gpmc_get_fclk_period()
vi arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c +53	- tusb_set_async_mode()
vi arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c +111	- tusb_set_sync_mode()

is -ENODEV appropriate when sysclk_ps == 0?

This was found by code analysis, please review.
------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
gpmc_get_fclk_period() may return 0 when gpmc_l3_clk is not enabled. This is
not checked in tusb6010_platform_retime() nor in tusb_set_async_mode() it
seems. In tusb_set_sync_mode() this may result in a division by zero.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c
index 15e5090..8df55f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int tusb6010_platform_retime(unsigned is_refclk)
 	unsigned	sysclk_ps;
 	int		status;
 
-	if (!refclk_psec)
+	if (!refclk_psec || sysclk_ps == 0)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	sysclk_ps = is_refclk ? refclk_psec : TUSB6010_OSCCLK_60;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux