Hi, * Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> [151222 15:41]: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> [151222 14:58]: > >> > >> I'm a little puzzled by how you chose to organize this branch. We usually > >> ask for SoC enablement and new DT files separately. Is there a reason you > >> couldn't split out the SoC pieces and include those in the soc branch, and > >> leave the DT contents for this one? > > > > Hmm yeah I guess I kept all the 81xx stuff in a single branch because of the > > earlier largeish set of 81xx fixes that had interlaced dts and SoC changes > > that had to be in a specific order to keep system booting because of bugs in > > the dts defined clocks. > > > > If you want to, I can respin these patches into two branches, one for dts and > > one for SoC changes. Probably both branches have to be based on the earlier > > branch "omap-for-v4.5/81xx-fixes-signed" to avoid merge conflicts though. > > Yeah, that sounds good. Please do. OK updated pull requests sent. It's now three separate pull requests starting with "[GIT PULL 1/3] reworked fix for earlier ti81xx changes for v4.5 merge window". Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
