On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> [151222 14:58]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:06:35PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> > The following changes since commit d893656e61040f3ff7b5f72a986052a348f3c94e: >> > >> > ARM: OMAP2+: Remove useless check for legacy booting for dm814x (2015-12-09 16:53:46 -0800) >> > >> > are available in the git repository at: >> > >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap tags/omap-for-v4.5/81xx-devices >> > >> > for you to fetch changes up to 8f2cf92a912ca7173d29c045d225588c9630ed94: >> > >> > ARM: dts: Add usb support for j5-eco evm (2015-12-21 10:43:29 -0800) >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> > Now with dm814x support fixed up enough where we can make use of some clocks, >> > we can adds some more basic devices for dm814x. And we can also add minimal >> > support for dra62x j5eco-evm that is another ti81xx variant related to dm814x. >> > >> > I would have rather merged this series toghether with the ADPLL clock driver, >> > and was waiting for that to get merged before sending out these patches. But >> > the ADPLL clock driver can be merged separately, and at least dm814x-evm, >> > dra62x-j5eco-evm, and t410 all boot with this series alone. So let's merge >> > these patches separately as that allows people to do development on these >> > platforms for other device drivers using the mainline kernel. >> > >> > Note that this series depends on the earlier 81xx-fixes and omap initcall >> > changes. It also depends on the DMA commit ae0add740cd0 that's already in >> > mainline. As this series is mostly DTS changes with a few related hwmod >> > changes, it's probably best merged along with the other DTS changes. >> >> I'm a little puzzled by how you chose to organize this branch. We usually >> ask for SoC enablement and new DT files separately. Is there a reason you >> couldn't split out the SoC pieces and include those in the soc branch, and >> leave the DT contents for this one? > > Hmm yeah I guess I kept all the 81xx stuff in a single branch because of the > earlier largeish set of 81xx fixes that had interlaced dts and SoC changes > that had to be in a specific order to keep system booting because of bugs in > the dts defined clocks. > > If you want to, I can respin these patches into two branches, one for dts and > one for SoC changes. Probably both branches have to be based on the earlier > branch "omap-for-v4.5/81xx-fixes-signed" to avoid merge conflicts though. Yeah, that sounds good. Please do. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
