Re: Linux 4.2.0-rc5: am335x: musb warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Felipe,

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Yegor Yefremov
<yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Yegor Yefremov
> <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 09:40:26AM +0200, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>>>> I performed a stress test with several FT4232H chips connected to a
>>>
>>> how many ?
>>
>> # lsusb -t
>> /:  Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=musb-hdrc/1p, 480M
>> /:  Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=musb-hdrc/1p, 480M
>>     |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
>>         |__ Port 1: Dev 3, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 1: Dev 3, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 1: Dev 3, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 1: Dev 3, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 3: Dev 5, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 3: Dev 5, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 3: Dev 5, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>         |__ Port 3: Dev 5, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>>
>> 3 chips a 4-ports are attached.
>
> Warnings appear on another device (without internal hub) with only one
> FT4232H too:
>
> # lsusb -t
> /:  Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=musb-hdrc/1p, 480M
>     |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>     |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>     |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>     |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>
>>>> hub, that is attached to one of the musb ports. So far the test was
>>>> successful for several hours. But I've seen following warnings:
>>>>
>>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>>> musb_ep_program 931: broken !rx_reinit, ep5 csr 0203
>>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>>> musb_ep_program 931: broken !rx_reinit, ep5 csr 0003
>>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>>> musb_ep_program 931: broken !rx_reinit, ep7 csr 0003
>>>>
>>>> Is this expected behavior?
>>>
>>> no, that shouldn't happen, but it does and, apparently, in more than one
>>> implementation. Wondering if you're running into endpoint limitation due
>>> to MUSB's poor transfer scheduling for non-bulk endpoints.
>>>
>>> --
>>> balbi

Now I have another trouble with msub and FTDI FT4232H chip. If I start
something like this on all 4 ports at 115200b/s, then pull USB cable
and the system freezes:

cat /dev/urandom > /dev/ttyUSB0
...
cat /dev/urandom > /dev/ttyUSB3

I see these messages:

ftdi_sio ttyUSB3: usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callback - nonzero urb
status: -110
ftdi_sio ttyUSB0: usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callback - nonzero urb
status: -110
ftdi_sio ttyUSB1: usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callback - nonzero urb
status: -110
ftdi_sio ttyUSB2: usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callback - nonzero urb
status: -110
ftdi_sio ttyUSB3: usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callback - nonzero urb
status: -110
ftdi_sio ttyUSB0: usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callback - nonzero urb
status: -110
ftdi_sio ttyUSB1: usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callback - nonzero urb
status: -110
ftdi_sio ttyUSB2: usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callback - nonzero urb
status: -110
ftdi_sio ttyUSB3: usb_serial_generic_write_bulk_callback - nonzero urb
status: -110

After them system reboots as my watchdog time expires.

Kernel 4.2.0-rc5

Older FTDI chips like FT2232 have no problems. Somehow is musb really
allergic to FTDI and vice versa :-(

Regards,
Yegor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux