Re: Linux 4.2.0-rc5: am335x: musb warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Yegor Yefremov
<yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> HI,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 09:40:26AM +0200, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>>> I performed a stress test with several FT4232H chips connected to a
>>
>> how many ?
>
> # lsusb -t
> /:  Bus 02.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=musb-hdrc/1p, 480M
> /:  Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=musb-hdrc/1p, 480M
>     |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=, Driver=hub/4p, 480M
>         |__ Port 1: Dev 3, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 1: Dev 3, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 1: Dev 3, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 1: Dev 3, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 2: Dev 4, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 3: Dev 5, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 3: Dev 5, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 3: Dev 5, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>         |__ Port 3: Dev 5, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
>
> 3 chips a 4-ports are attached.

Warnings appear on another device (without internal hub) with only one
FT4232H too:

# lsusb -t
/:  Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=musb-hdrc/1p, 480M
    |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 0, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
    |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 1, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
    |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 2, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M
    |__ Port 1: Dev 2, If 3, Class=, Driver=ftdi_sio, 480M

>>> hub, that is attached to one of the musb ports. So far the test was
>>> successful for several hours. But I've seen following warnings:
>>>
>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>> musb_ep_program 931: broken !rx_reinit, ep5 csr 0203
>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>> musb_ep_program 931: broken !rx_reinit, ep5 csr 0003
>>> musb_host_rx 1973: Rx interrupt with no errors or packet!
>>> musb_ep_program 931: broken !rx_reinit, ep7 csr 0003
>>>
>>> Is this expected behavior?
>>
>> no, that shouldn't happen, but it does and, apparently, in more than one
>> implementation. Wondering if you're running into endpoint limitation due
>> to MUSB's poor transfer scheduling for non-bulk endpoints.
>>
>> --
>> balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux