On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 07:51:16PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Something like this maybe? My personal feeling is that as 0aa525d11859 was wrong, it should be reverted and this should be another attempt to fix the problem. In other words, there should be two patches, one a revert of the previously known bad commit and this one having another go at it. I feel that would be a better approach, since then we don't end up with this change building on a previously know buggy change. It would also make the changes to this solution from the previous, known-to-work-for-decades code more obvious. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
