On 02/11/2015 09:42 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: >> Reverting makes sense to me if it has caused a regression. Maybe Sebastian >> can update his patch to do this based on some quirk flag instead? > > That's fine with me. There's a 'bugs' field in struct 8250_uart_port and > UART_BUG_* defines in 8250/8250.h for that purpose. Makes sense. Reading an empty FIFO does not look right. Maybe we should do the bug flag the other way around? But I can do what I am told to so if there is more fallout than just this Marvell UART I could come around with a patch to the bug field for the older OMAP. > Regards, > Peter Hurley Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
