On 09/25/2014 06:42 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2014-09-24 09:53:46 [+0200]:
>
>> * Peter Hurley | 2014-09-23 13:03:51 [-0400]:
>>
>>> But DMA is cheating if the UART driver's tx_empty() method is saying the
>>> transmitter is empty while TX DMA is still running.
>> This shouldn't be the case. But I will check this once I able to.
>
> I added
>
> |#define BOTH_EMPTY (UART_LSR_TEMT | UART_LSR_THRE)
> | trace_printk("delay <%d>\n", (lsr & BOTH_EMPTY) == BOTH_EMPTY ? 1 : 0);
>
> in my set_termios() and the trace shows
> | vi-949 [000] d... 70.477002: omap8250_restore_regs: delay <0>
>
> so no, it does not wait until TX FIFO is empty. It looks like it uses
> TCSANOW instead of TCSADRAIN. And since this looks "legal" I will delay
> it until TX-DMA is complete because it is known to stall the DMA operation.
I just verified that GNU readline6 uses ioctl(TCSETSW, ...) to do the set_termios
(which is the ioctl that libc should use for tcsetattr(TCSADRAIN)).
Maybe this userspace is using a readline()-alike that has a bug by not using the
correct tcsetattr() action?
Or maybe the glibc-equivalent has the bug, and tcsetattr(TCSADRAIN) is not using
ioctl(TCSETSW)?
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
